Introduction The Republican National Convention of 2004 was launched in New York City’s Madison Square Garden during the final warm and humid days of August. To the opponents of the agenda being promoted by the Republican Party, this was a confrontational choice of venue, because of the appearance that political advantage was being sought based on the federal administration’s response to the events of 9/11. A Republican convention had never before been staged in New York, perhaps because of the tendency of that city’s residents to be liberal in their politics. However, one of the peculiarities of American politics at the turn of the 21st century was the election of government officials that were more conservative than the majority of the electorate; during that year, the Mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg, and the Governor of New York State, George Pataki, were both members of the Republican party. So, despite the objections of many city residents, the RNC went on as planned, along with official assertions that maximum security measures would be instituted to prevent or react to acts of terrorism.
To the members of the many liberal activist groups in New York however, the choice of their city as the location of the Republican Convention was actually a great convenience. The selection of Boston for the site of the Democratic National Convention a month earlier was a significant hindrance to the efforts of conservative activists because that city was even more liberal in its politics than New York. However, there were hundreds of groups stationed in Manhattan and its surrounding boroughs that were ready and willing to take the opportunity to vocally oppose the policies of both the Republican Party and their apparent candidate for re-election, George W. Bush. Many activist organizers had planned large-scale acts of civil disobedience during that week, and their intentions, if not the actual specifics, were well known to the officials given responsibility of securing peace and order during the convention.
It was within this context that several mass arrests were performed on August 31st, a date which was given the codename “A31” by many activist groups. On that single day, 1200 persons were arrested in various parts of the city. To handle such a large volume of arrestees, the New York Police Department had constructed a facility in a former bus depot, known as “Pier 57;” however, delays occurred in the processing of the detained protesters, which resulted in jail times that in most cases were longer than the 24-hour limit required by state law. The producer of this film was caught in one of the mass arrests that occurred during an A31 protest, and offers video documentation of the three days leading up to and including his arrest. The result is an account that is primarily based on his personal experience, but which provides visibility on the events as captured by his video camera on the street. Viewers of this documentary are encouraged to conclude for themselves whether the actions of the protesters, as well as the response of the police to the organized demonstrations, were justified.
Whether or not one agrees with the ideologies of any of the players in this production, it’s easy to see that a fascinating dynamic was occurring on the streets of New York late in the summer of 2004, which was played out for the world to see through the efforts of hundreds of videographers and independent news organizations. This film is but one version of the story, as told by an observer who inadvertently, perhaps naively, became an active participant. It is hoped that the account of these events will encourage the viewer to be conscious of the tension that exists between the rights of people to express themselves, and the rights of the ordinary citizens to feel secure in an increasingly violent and divisive world. back to top |